So what does he have to say? Not a lot, as it happens. We get the usual shite about how 'Rangers' are still the same team and how they were 'sent' down to Division 3. We also get the stuff about how following 'Rangers' is a 'way of life.' Mostly, though, he wants to see 'Rangers Men' at Ibrox.
'I would like a guy to come in, a Rangers man through and through and someone the fans can identify with and trust. There are a lot of wealthy, well-meaning Rangers guys out there who have the money to buy up these shares.'
I notice, however, that he says nothing about putting any of his own money in! Didn't he get one of those EBTs? Surely he could use some of his 'loan' to help out? Of course, that'll never happen. It seems to be the 'way of life' to greet and moan but always wanting 'somebody else' to actually do something!
And what about the 'somebody else'? It seems that there are very few of them that are happy about Green's reappearance. Loony Leggat was doing his nut about it and now Ferguson comes crawling out of the woodwork to put the boot in. And Sooperally has got his tuppence-worth in as well about his erstwhile pal.
Has McCoist even got a mind of his own? He seems to just go along with whoever is in charge at the time and then has a go at them when things change. Remember how he was having weekly 'chats' with Whyte, only to reveal later that he hadn't spoken to him for months? Then Green was the greatest thing since sliced bread; now he's nothing but a loudmouth. Recently Ally was singing the praises of Mather; I wonder what he'll be saying about him if he is ousted!
Bill McMurdo, meanwhile, seems to be the only one willing to stick by Green to the bitter end. His criticism of Jim McColl (Did he not used to be on the Beechgrove Garden?), however, leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Apparently he doesn't want McColl at Ibrox because the man supports Scottish independence! According to McMurdo, this does not sit well with 'Rangers' Unionist ethos!' It's meant to be a football team, for Christ's sake! So, despite his protestations to the contrary, McMurdo wants a 'Rangers Man' as well!
Reading McMurdo's blog is quite enlightening. One bam thinks it's the appropriate time to bang on about the whole world being under control of the Rothschilds, in league with the Jesuits! Presumably they were to blame for Ersatz FC being booted out of the League Cup yesterday by the mighty Forfar! After all, Ally' s already pointing the finger at Charles Green and the signing embargo. It's always everybody else's fault, eh?
So, essentially, what they're all looking for to take over at Ibrox is a billionaire that supports the Union, hates Catholics, hates the BBC, does the 'Rickets Walk' every summer and looks to blame everyone, including the Vatican, the Jesuits and the Rothschilds whenever anything goes wrong! GSOH, non-smoker preferred. Oh, and no need to worry if you're a crook; the SFA will get the blame for that for not stopping you from taking over.
Oh, and a final thought for Sooperally. If the transfer embargo was to blame for you being beaten by Forfar, that must mean that you needed your new players and that the ones playing today are not good enough! So Auld Hughie Green is right; yer team's pish!
'Forfar deserved thur win 'n 'at, but we hud aff-field issues tae contend wi' 'n 'at, an' Charles Green wiz sayin' things aboot us 'n 'at, poor Lee McCulloch wiz pyoor greetin' 'n 'at, an' it wiz a full moon an' Venus wiz in Virgo 'n 'at, an' thurs they Jesuits 'n 'at, but Ah'm no' here tae make excuses!'
No comments:
Post a Comment